Rewards Gone Wrong!

Two businessmen holding up trophies
Share This Post:
Rate this post

Rewarding employees can be tricky business. Unfortunately, despite your best efforts to provide meaningful rewards to your employees, your efforts to reward employees can go terribly wrong. Understanding who you are rewarding is critically important to achieving the goals of your reward programs. This lack of understanding can result in some unanticipated results, causing your employees to not feel rewarded and even feel punished because of your reward programs. It is important to understand that a reward to one employee can be a punishment to another. To decide if the following would potentially be a reward or a punishment to employees, you might be trying to provide some form of recognition or opportunity in their careers:

  • Extra work
  • New assignment
  • Job transfer
  • Public recognition
  • Overtime
  • New office/workstation
  • Lunch with the boss

Don’t miss this intriguing
webinar from HRDQ-U

Don’t miss this intriguing webinar from HRDQ-U

Designing Effective Employee Reward Programs

Think about how each of these examples could be perceived as either a positive or something undesirable to different employees or groups of employees. Would every one of your employees want to be invited to have lunch with the boss as a form of recognition and reward? Probably not. To some, this may seem like a great opportunity to spend one-on-one time with the boss to highlight their accomplishments and potential with the company or organization. However, for others, this may make them feel very uncomfortable and fear that they might say something wrong or even career-derailing. The point is that you need to give some forethought to the rewards you offer employees to ensure that they will be positively received.

Reward programs can have disastrous results if not designed without consideration, given how they might backfire. At one manufacturing facility, the operations manager began a program to reward the crew with the highest production during their shift for one month. However, shortly after the program began, the results were opposite of what was expected. In this continuous operation, each crew took over production from the previous crew. However, according to the program’s rules, each crew only received credit for the production that began during their shift. Thus, crews began scrapping any production started during the previous shift, not wishing to help the previous crew’s production numbers. This resulted in higher scrap rates and overall lower production numbers. Hardly what the operation manager had in mind when he announced this reward program! The solution was to change the program design from rewarding the crew with the highest production to that of the entire operation’s production numbers for the duration of the program. The results were increased production and lower scrap rates for the entire operation and the goal of this reward program was finally achieved to the satisfaction of all the employees involved.

Many organizations have “Employee of the Month” programs to recognize their employees throughout the year. These programs may provide what is perceived to be a well-received form of recognition to recipients and should continue to be part of the organization’s overall reward programs. However, in other situations, being named the Employee of the Month may not always be considered desirable. How could this be the case? Well, depending on the organization and work environment, employees may not want this type of reward visibility. There may be peer pressure concerning being rewarded this publicly or even questions about recipients being deserving of this reward. This would be particularly evident if this recognition was simply rotated throughout the year with little no to consideration given to qualifications for this reward. All these factors can cause this type of reward to become devalued by virtually everyone in the organization.

There are many factors that can cause these reward-gone-wrong scenarios. These include:

  • Right Person/Wrong Reward
  • Wrong Person/Right Reward
  • Right Group/Wrong Reward
  • Wrong Group Rewarded/Right Group ignored
  • Reward too Many/ Too Few
  • Reward too Big/ Too Small

 

Reward programs should be designed with these considerations in mind. Most important is to understand what is perceived to be of value to your reward recipients. Lack of this understanding can cause even your best efforts to recognize your employees to fail to meet this objective.

Author
Peter Garber Bio Pic
Peter R. Garber

Peter R. Garber is a retired Human Resource Professional with over 35 years of experience working for a Fortune 200 corporation. During his career, he held a variety of HR roles, including assignments at manufacturing facilities across the country, and later spent twenty years at the company’s corporate headquarters. He is the author of over 50 books and learning activities on HR and business-related topics. He has been invited to present seminars and webinars on numerous occasions based on his works and has made presentations at international conferences and colleges. Mr. Garber was also an adjunct instructor at the University of Pittsburgh Business School.

Mr. Garber became interested in the topic of employee reward programs as a result of observing firsthand just how difficult it was to get them right. He noticed that many of the organization’s efforts to provide employees with meaningful rewards often failed to meet this objective. He realized that there needed to be greater thought and analysis given to designing employee reward programs to ensure their effectiveness. This program is a result of his research and experience designing more effective employee reward programs.

Connect with Peter through email at prgarber2110@yahoo.com.

Recommended Webinar
Designing Effective Employee Reward Programs

Designing effective rewards for employees requires the ABC Behavioral Model. Understand how to use positive reinforcement for best results.

Designing Effective Employee Reward Programs | HRDQU Webinar
More HRDQ-U Blog Posts

The most common word shared across most definitions of leadership is influence.

Consulting has grown steadily in recent years and is poised to be an essential contributor to organizations.

Read this blog to learn the 7 tips to maintaining professionalism during performances from a Disney veteran by reading this blog.
Related Topics
Career development
Career Development
Business coaching webinar
Coaching
Creativity and innovation skills training
Creativity and Innovation
Webinar customer service
Customer Service
Rewards Gone Wrong!
Decision Making
Diversity and inclusion webinars
Diversity and Inclusion
Rewards Gone Wrong!
Leadership
PM webinars
Project Management
Log In