Who experiences greater levels of stress: you or your boss? When I ask this question while teaching workshops on leadership, nearly all the bosses in the room respond that they are the ones under greater stress. They’re wrong. Hard data makes it clear that non-leaders experience greater stress, and in many instances, it has a negative effect on their performance.
Consider two studies published in 2014 by Gary D. Sherman, et al. In the first, a sample of non-leaders in the Boston metropolitan area was compared to middle- to high-level government and military leaders participating in an executive education program at Harvard. The non-leaders showed higher levels of salivary cortisol, a physiological indicator of stress, and higher levels of self-reported anxiety, a psychological indicator of stress.
A second study looked at the effect that feeling in control had on lowering stress in a group of middle- to high-level government and military leaders. To determine the feeling of being in control, researchers looked at the number of subordinates, the number of direct reports, and the authority to make decisions concerning subordinates. The results supported the study’s hypothesis that a sense of control from having more subordinates and greater authority over them was associated with lower stress as measured by both lower salivary cortisol and self-reported anxiety.
The results of both studies are consistent with those of the pioneering Whitehall studies of British civil servants in lower-status jobs, which found government workers who were lower in the hierarchy experienced poorer cardiovascular health and lower life expectancies.

